</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable>time_epoch</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
transaction's completion time, as a Unix-epoch time stamp
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable>time_us</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
fractional-second part of transaction's completion time, in
microseconds
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable>schedule_lag</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
transaction start delay, that is the difference between the
transaction's scheduled start time and the time it actually
started, in microseconds
(present only if <option>--rate</option> is specified)
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable>retries</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
count of retries after serialization or deadlock errors during the
transaction
(present only if <option>--max-tries</option> is not equal to one)
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
</para>
<para>
When both <option>--rate</option> and <option>--latency-limit</option> are used,
the <replaceable>time</replaceable> for a skipped transaction will be reported as
<literal>skipped</literal>.
If the transaction ends with a failure, its <replaceable>time</replaceable>
will be reported as <literal>failed</literal>. If you use the
<option>--failures-detailed</option> option, the
<replaceable>time</replaceable> of the failed transaction will be reported as
<literal>serialization</literal> or
<literal>deadlock</literal> depending on the type of failure (see
<xref linkend="failures-and-retries"/> for more information).
</para>
<para>
Here is a snippet of a log file generated in a single-client run:
<screen>
0 199 2241 0 1175850568 995598
0 200 2465 0 1175850568 998079
0 201 2513 0 1175850569 608
0 202 2038 0 1175850569 2663
</screen>
Another example with <literal>--rate=100</literal>
and <literal>--latency-limit=5</literal> (note the additional
<replaceable>schedule_lag</replaceable> column):
<screen>
0 81 4621 0 1412881037 912698 3005
0 82 6173 0 1412881037 914578 4304
0 83 skipped 0 1412881037 914578 5217
0 83 skipped 0 1412881037 914578 5099
0 83 4722 0 1412881037 916203 3108
0 84 4142 0 1412881037 918023 2333
0 85 2465 0 1412881037 919759 740
</screen>
In this example, transaction 82 was late, because its latency (6.173 ms) was
over the 5 ms limit. The next two transactions were skipped, because they
were already late before they were even started.
</para>
<para>
The following example shows a snippet of a log file with failures and
retries, with the maximum number of tries set to 10 (note the additional
<replaceable>retries</replaceable> column):
<screen>
3 0 47423 0 1499414498 34501 3
3 1 8333 0 1499414498 42848 0
3 2 8358 0 1499414498 51219 0
4 0 72345 0 1499414498 59433 6
1 3 41718 0 1499414498 67879 4
1 4 8416 0 1499414498 76311 0
3 3 33235 0 1499414498 84469 3
0 0 failed 0 1499414498 84905 9
2 0 failed 0 1499414498 86248 9
3 4 8307 0 1499414498 92788 0
</screen>
</para>
<para>
If the <option>--failures-detailed</option> option is used, the type of
failure is reported in the <replaceable>time</replaceable> like this:
<screen>
3 0 47423 0 1499414498 34501 3
3 1 8333 0 1499414498 42848 0
3 2 8358 0 1499414498 51219 0
4 0 72345 0 1499414498 59433 6
1 3 41718 0 1499414498 67879 4
1 4 8416 0 1499414498 76311 0
3 3 33235 0 1499414498 84469 3
0 0 serialization 0 1499414498 84905 9
2 0 serialization 0 1499414498 86248 9
3 4 8307 0 1499414498 92788 0
</screen>
</para>
<para>
When running a long test on hardware that can handle a lot of transactions,
the log files can become very large. The <option>--sampling-rate</option> option