detail for the executor to run it.
In the rest of this section we'll ignore the distinction between paths
and plans.
</para>
<sect2 id="planner-optimizer-generating-possible-plans">
<title>Generating Possible Plans</title>
<para>
The planner/optimizer starts by generating plans for scanning each
individual relation (table) used in the query. The possible plans
are determined by the available indexes on each relation.
There is always the possibility of performing a
sequential scan on a relation, so a sequential scan plan is always
created. Assume an index is defined on a
relation (for example a B-tree index) and a query contains the
restriction
<literal>relation.attribute OPR constant</literal>. If
<literal>relation.attribute</literal> happens to match the key of the B-tree
index and <literal>OPR</literal> is one of the operators listed in
the index's <firstterm>operator class</firstterm>, another plan is created using
the B-tree index to scan the relation. If there are further indexes
present and the restrictions in the query happen to match a key of an
index, further plans will be considered. Index scan plans are also
generated for indexes that have a sort ordering that can match the
query's <literal>ORDER BY</literal> clause (if any), or a sort ordering that
might be useful for merge joining (see below).
</para>
<para>
If the query requires joining two or more relations,
plans for joining relations are considered
after all feasible plans have been found for scanning single relations.
The three available join strategies are:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
<firstterm>nested loop join</firstterm>: The right relation is scanned
once for every row found in the left relation. This strategy
is easy to implement but can be very time consuming. (However,
if the right relation can be scanned with an index scan, this can
be a good strategy. It is possible to use values from the current
row of the left relation as keys for the index scan of the right.)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
<firstterm>merge join</firstterm>: Each relation is sorted on the join
attributes before the join starts. Then the two relations are
scanned in parallel, and matching rows are combined to form
join rows. This kind of join is
attractive because each relation has to be scanned only once.
The required sorting might be achieved either by an explicit sort
step, or by scanning the relation in the proper order using an
index on the join key.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
<firstterm>hash join</firstterm>: the right relation is first scanned
and loaded into a hash table, using its join attributes as hash keys.
Next the left relation is scanned and the
appropriate values of every row found are used as hash keys to
locate the matching rows in the table.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>
When the query involves more than two relations, the final result
must be built up by a tree of join steps, each with two inputs.
The planner examines different possible join sequences to find the
cheapest one.
</para>
<para>
If the query uses fewer than <xref linkend="guc-geqo-threshold"/>
relations, a near-exhaustive search is conducted to find the best
join sequence. The planner preferentially considers joins between any
two relations for which there exists a corresponding join clause in the
<literal>WHERE</literal> qualification (i.e., for
which a restriction like <literal>where rel1.attr1=rel2.attr2</literal>
exists). Join pairs with no join clause are considered only when there
is no other