you can access attribute names as `a`, using `args.a`, which was
given as an additional attribute to the function.
> **Warning**
>
> `args@` binds the name `args` to the attribute set that is passed to the function.
> In particular, `args` does *not* include any default values specified with `?` in the function's set pattern.
>
> For instance
>
> ```nix
> let
> f = args@{ a ? 23, ... }: [ a args ];
> in
> f {}
> ```
>
> is equivalent to
>
> ```nix
> let
> f = args @ { ... }: [ (args.a or 23) args ];
> in
> f {}
> ```
>
> and both expressions will evaluate to:
>
> ```nix
> [ 23 {} ]
> ```
- All bindings introduced by the function are in scope in the entire function expression; not just in the body.
It can therefore be used in default values.
> **Example**
>
> A parameter (`x`), is used in the default value for another parameter (`y`):
>
> ```nix
> let
> f = { x, y ? [x] }: { inherit y; };
> in
> f { x = 3; }
> ```
>
> This evaluates to:
>
> ```nix
> {
> y = [ 3 ];
> }
> ```
> **Example**
>
> The binding of an `@` pattern, `args`, is used in the default value for a parameter, `x`:
>
> ```nix
> let
> f = args@{ x ? args.a, ... }: x;
> in
> f { a = 1; }
> ```
>
> This evaluates to:
>
> ```nix
> 1
> ```
Note that functions do not have names. If you want to give them a name,
you can bind them to an attribute, e.g.,
```nix
let concat = { x, y }: x + y;
in concat { x = "foo"; y = "bar"; }
```
## Conditionals
Conditionals look like this:
```nix
if e1 then e2 else e3
```
where *e1* is an expression that should evaluate to a Boolean value
(`true` or `false`).
## Assertions
Assertions are generally used to check that certain requirements on or
between features and dependencies hold. They look like this:
```nix
assert e1; e2
```
where *e1* is an expression that should evaluate to a Boolean value. If
it evaluates to `true`, *e2* is returned; otherwise expression
evaluation is aborted and a backtrace is printed.
Here is a Nix expression for the Subversion package that shows how
assertions can be used:.
```nix
{ localServer ? false
, httpServer ? false
, sslSupport ? false
, pythonBindings ? false
, javaSwigBindings ? false
, javahlBindings ? false
, stdenv, fetchurl
, openssl ? null, httpd ? null, db4 ? null, expat, swig ? null, j2sdk ? null
}:
assert localServer -> db4 != null; ①
assert httpServer -> httpd != null && httpd.expat == expat; ②
assert sslSupport -> openssl != null && (httpServer -> httpd.openssl == openssl); ③
assert pythonBindings -> swig != null && swig.pythonSupport;
assert javaSwigBindings -> swig != null && swig.javaSupport;
assert javahlBindings -> j2sdk != null;
stdenv.mkDerivation {
name = "subversion-1.1.1";
...
openssl = if sslSupport then openssl else null; ④
...
}
```
The points of interest are:
1. This assertion states that if Subversion is to have support for
local repositories, then Berkeley DB is needed. So if the Subversion
function is called with the `localServer` argument set to `true` but